The Delta Snake Review

The Delta Snake Review

Translate

Saturday, March 30, 2024

Review: 2007 MIM Fender Jaguar HH

Review: Fender Jaguar HH

As one peruses the various Fender reissues based on vintage models, this one catches the eye immediately for two reasons. At first glance, it seems to be an exact replica of a Fender Jaguar for only 630.00 instead of the extortionate collector price of 3000.00 (on up).

At second glance, you realize it isn't an exact replica after all. It has two “special design” humbuckers, and what looks suspiciously like a tune-a-matic bridge. Fender prefers to call it an adjusto-matic (but a rose is a rose).

I'd have preferred it the other way around. Keep the old-style pickups, keep that kooky tremolo bar and bridge (and thus capable of making some pretty cool sounds) and get rid of the vintage tone and volume controls. It's a simple, yet obtuse switching system, with switches to turn off pickups, cut treble, etc. and it's an obscure system for a reason. People didn't like it. However, the chrome panels the switches are mounted on do add a vintage cool to the look, and this is guitar is all about the look (aren’t they all, though).

It sports a rakish black and chrome look, with that famous speedy looking body, and a short scale “C” neck that is as easy to play as any Gibson. The humbuckers are Fender design, and aren't as full sounding as the competition, but has a fine cutting edge. Closer to P-90 thickness than a Gibson 490 series humbucker.

One thing you should be aware of is that it will not sound like a Strat even if it has some similarity. It has its own sound, accentuated by the use of humbuckers. It's not as sweet in high gain mode with a tougher sound. In clean mode, however, it’s as warm as a Strat. 

Jaguars were always underrated blues and jazz guitars (due to the main celebrity players being alternative artists), but you will have a lot of sound at your fingertips. The tuners are small and easy to tune, and the headstock is the original classic large type. The rosewood fretboard is of decent quality, and the alder body ensures that you have a durable workhorse underneath the hood.

Up to about a couple of years ago, The Fender line was starting to get a bit dull and added a few wrong turns in direction (the “Tele-Acoustic” being the oddest). But one can now look at the Fender line from bottom to top and find a full array of exciting new guitars, most in an affordable price range.

Fender has done a great job with this Jaguar, and you'll have a lot more fun with your's than some collectors will, staring at a 4000.00 mint original displayed in some glass case like a precious jewel or zoo animal.

- Al Handa

  2007 

Note: This review first appeared on the ePinions.com site in 2007. This and other reviews were short takes that accompanied the link to a business that sold the guitar. As a rule, the guitar had to be at least examined and played by the reviewer (and ideally owned). In my case, a severe case of GAS made it possible to have at least owned the reviewed instrument for a short while. I'm reprinting these as having another source on a guitar never hurts, even if the reviews aren't definitive. Other than minor corrections, these short takes are unchanged from the original text. I figure that it might be helpful to keep the older perspective.

 

The Quitturz by Al Handa





AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



Here's info on some of my Vella books:




The Quitturz (title not changed on ad yet)


https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B09PC3L6PC



I, Ivy


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0B3RCBT4D



The Forbidden Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyde


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJ2TW4P1



The Boogie Underground Think Tank: How To Survive The End Of Civilization


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BG6LNXTG



The Adventures Of Queen Khleopahtra: Ruler Of Egypt, Time Traveler, and Literary Detective


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJC122G7


Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Please add any cuts you like to your playlists!

 

 

 

 

Friday, March 29, 2024

Review: Gold Tone AC-5 Composite 5-String Banjo

 Review: 2012 Gold Tone AC-5 Composite Banjo

The Gold Tone AC-5 Composite Banjo is a design that was introduced in 2012 as their new entry level/travel banjo. Its main selling point was the use of a rim that is made of a composite material similar to the Ovation guitar.

The ads state that the design “may stray a bit” from the traditional wood design, but that's not entirely true. Even in the earlier days of the banjo, the rim or body have been made of materials like gourds, steel, aluminum or wood covered with steel or aluminum. Some of the best banjos I've ever heard and had a chance to play had metal rims, particularly the British made ones.

The closest antecedent would be those old Kay banjos that used a body made of bakelite, and to this day has a cult audience, and the later Rover that used a similar material in its entry level model. Both had a tone and clarity that was excellent for its price range.

What gave non-wood banjos a bad name was the infamous 70's Asian banjos that used aluminum rims. The trademark sound was bassy and echoed, with bad intonation. The thing was, even back then, no one seriously felt that the aluminum rim was the problem. Aluminum rims are still in use today in the 200.00 range and are considered a good value. 

The problem with the Asian banjos of the period was that after the rim, they added lousy necks, cheap hardware, inferior bridge and nut materials, and pegs that seemed to be designed to go out of tune. 

This led to the aura of the “wood banjo” being superior. Which is actually an irony. All of the high-end banjos have a brass (or in the case of the early Gibsons, aluminum) tone ring mounted on top of the rim where the banjo head makes contact. Without that metal ring, you lose a lot of tone and volume. An all-wood banjo would be almost unheard of in bluegrass, where volume is king.

There are all wood banjos where the top of the rim is shaped like a tone ring. The original high quality economy banjo, the Deering Goodtime, was an all-wood type. Great sound, but with a volume level that made it a better learning or solo banjo than one you could use in an ensemble. That design is frankly out of date, as many banjos in its price range use some kind of tone ring now.

In other words, the idea that a “wood banjo” is better is a myth. You can make one, but only for certain applications, and you sacrifice volume and aspects of tone that would be necessary for genres like bluegrass and even country.

The Gold Tone AC-5 goes into another direction, and not only has a rim that is a composite, but an old-fashioned shallow resonator as well. In addition, the inner surface is divided into four sections by shallow ridges, designed to bounce back sound like an Ovation guitar.

I'm not sure about that theory, but it does work. It's one of the loudest banjos in that price range, and I tried it out against pretty much every banjo that was similar on the wall of the music store. A good high end resonator banjo is louder, but of course, a lot more expensive.

The tone is surprisingly similar to a maple wood banjo, though my ears it's rounder, and purer in tone. In other words, those who like wood rimmed banjos may find this one a little bit too clean and chimey. The resonator adds sustain, and the design seems to eliminate the problem of low and mid-priced banjos all have, which is that the volume drops as you play up the neck. You can go past the 12th fret on this one.

Which brings us to the neck. It's one of the best necks I've ever played. It's non-tapered and slim, and double truss rodded to compensate for the strength that you lose with such a design. It has a bone nut, the guitar pegs stay in tune (though they feel a bit cheap when putting on new strings), and the rosewood fretboard with medium jumbo frets has a great feel and intonation is good all the way up.

 Though it's billed as an entry level banjo, I can only recommend it to beginners with the warning that one flaw is the way Gold Tone attached the resonator is close to being bush league. It uses a single screw, which was common with old tenor banjos, but it goes up into the coordinator rod using a hole that's so shallow (not even a quarter inch) that it's incredibly easy to strip the thread.

The resonator fits very snug to the rim, which is good, but it makes it hard to tell if you've unscrewed the bolt enough to remove it, and overtightning would be potentially disastrous. If you try one out at a store, don't buy it until they remove the resonator to confirm if the bolt thread is intact, and if you get it by mail order, that should be the first thing you check.

 That said, the Gold Tone has a feature set that's well above its 340.00 street price. The rim and resonator have a tone that I found perfect for my needs, the neck is superior, bone nut, nice solid metal adjustable tailpiece, decent hardwood and ebony bridge, and very competent pegs.

 Some may find the use of guitar pegs at this price range a bit off-putting, as by the time you get to the 400-dollar range, traditional planetary pegs are standard in most models. Personally, I've never cared. Cheap planetary pegs are as bad as cheap guitar tuners, and in some ways worse (particularly for beginners). If it stays in tune, style of peg is fine with me. Guitar pegs are actually easier to tune.

 One very nice thing about the AC-5 is that it's relatively light for a resonator banjo. I used to carry around bluegrass type resonator banjos and it always felt like carrying a bowling ball and found that I preferred open backs anyway. This model has a nice hybrid tone that sounds like an open-back, but with more volume and resonance. If you take the resonator off (carefully), the open back sound is also excellent.

 I can personally get around the problem of that fragile little screw arrangement since my general practice is to remove the screw and slot the resonator on as needed (I like to switch back and forth), and the thing fits snug enough that it won't fall off unless you're playing live standing up. I mainly use it for recording, so not having the resonator secured is no big deal.

In the case of other users, most will just use it as a resonator banjo, or remove the shell and use it as an open-back, and rarely switch. In either case, the resonator does have to come off to do basic adjustments like loosening or tightening the head, or adjusting the neck, so it's an issue Gold Tone needs to solve before a bunch come back to the factory with stripped resonator attachment bolts. Even the use of higher quality steel for the mounting section and bolt would be a vast improvement.

In my case, the banjo has been placed alongside of the Recording King Madison and the Gold Tone old time in my collection, and that fantastic neck has made my favorite instrument even more fun to play.

If the price tag had been 600.00, and it was equipped with planetary pegs, I'd have bought it anyway...but then, I've owned both a vintage Kay Bakelite and Rover composite banjo in the past, so the Gold Tone AC-5 was a welcome guest in my collection. I can add that I like Ovations to boot.

In your case, definitely try before you buy, and maybe you'll find that this new design is the perfect entry level banjo that will last just fine into the intermediate phase, or as the only one you'll ever buy (which is the most common scenario).

Beginners get a lot of advice, the most common is to get the most expensive one you can afford. That advice is ten years old, and not valid anymore. Most of us could care less about taking a path towards a 2,000+ dollar banjo. So, unless you're on that path to an expensive banjo (and it's a good one, don't get me wrong) the AC-5 has brought in a new question into the equation, which is, why pay more?

- Al Handa

  2013 

Note: This review first appeared on the ePinions.com site in 2013. This and other reviews were short takes that accompanied the link to a business that sold the guitar. As a rule, the guitar had to be at least examined and played by the reviewer (and ideally owned). In my case, a severe case of GAS made it possible to have at least owned the reviewed instrument for a short while. I'm reprinting these as having another source on a guitar never hurts, even if the reviews aren't definitive. Other than minor corrections, these short takes are unchanged from the original text. I figure that it might be helpful to keep the older perspective.

 

The Quitturz by Al Handa





AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



Here's info on some of my Vella books:




The Quitturz (title not changed on ad yet)


https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B09PC3L6PC



I, Ivy


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0B3RCBT4D



The Forbidden Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyde


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJ2TW4P1



The Boogie Underground Think Tank: How To Survive The End Of Civilization


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BG6LNXTG



The Adventures Of Queen Khleopahtra: Ruler Of Egypt, Time Traveler, and Literary Detective


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJC122G7


Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Please add any cuts you like to your playlists!

Review: 2013 Gibson L6-S

 Review: 2013 Gibson L6S

The Gibson L6S Limited Edition electric guitar is a reissue of an early and mid-70s guitar that was the first collaboration between Gibson and guitar genius Bill Lawrence. The original intention was to create a lower cost guitar that could produce a multitude of tones and compete with the then very popular Fender Telecasters and Strats.

The actual design that Lawrence created didn't make it to market, but a reasonable compromise did. He felt the L6 (at least with the early models) was a great performance guitar. It was designated the L6-S (with a dash) and it was an all maple guitar with a six position switch that varied the combination of sounds made by two Lawrence designed high output ceramic humbuckers, augmented by a standard tone knob and mid-range boost. These were probably one of the first, if not the first of the high output pickups that later became a staple of the boutique PUP market.

The new guitar came out of the gate fast, with endorsements by Carlos Santana and others, but sales tailed off and it was discontinued later in the 70s. If one reads comments about it on the internet, you can see the main objection was it didn't sound like a Gibson (it's worded in many ways, but that's essentially the objection). Later opinions by actual owner vary, but most liked it.

I should note, for the sake of disclosure, that I own a 1973 cherry burst model, and love it. However, that's because I like Fenders and was as a result attracted to this guitar, and am not so exclusive about Gibsons for various reasons (at least with the electrics).

The thing about an all maple guitar is that it's bright, and certainly so for the early 70s when the vast assortment of amps and pedals we now have weren't available. Add to that, it's a guitar that takes at least a month or two to really get to know. It's not a Les Paul and will sound really weird to someone who expects it to sound like one.

In short, it was not a real success, and it languished for decades as a Gibson you could easily get for less than 500.00 (or had a hard time selling for that price). Which has changed of course. Now a good condition L6-S run more in the 900.00 to 1600.00 depending on if it has the original Bill Lawrence hardware, etc, and the fact that it's a Gibson (add 500.00 for the headstock....).

The one opinion about the guitar that did emerge over the years is that it was a superb blues machine. Which it is. On one setting for example, it can sound exactly like old Muddy Waters on slide, and it's response to finger style jazz and blues is outstanding. It can also reproduce the ZZ Top sound to a T.

Gibson reissued it with a vastly different configuration, so that all that's really left of Lawrence's conception is the maple body and single cut L-5 jazz guitar body shape.

To save a lot of explanation, I'll just list the two sets of knob settings (which is at the heart of both guitars):

Original Gibson L6-S: 

Both pickups, in series

Neck pickup, alone

Both pickups, in parallel

Both pickups, parallel out of phase, with the neck pickup's bass response restricted thought a series capacitor.

Bridge pickup, alone

Both pickups, series out of phase

Mid-range boost knob


Gibson Limited Run L6S:

1-Bridge humbucker

2-Bridge single-coil

3- Bridge and neck single-coil

4- Bridge and neck humbucker

5- Neck single-coil

6- Neck humbucker

Tone push/pull tone control for treble cut

Tone push/pull tone control for bass cut

As you can see, the Limited Edition is still configured to give the player the option of a Fender-like sound, but the 490 series humbuckers will also give you more of a Gibson-like tone. Coil splitting is a concept most modern guitarists understand, as with push/pull knobs, so it does more or less do what Bill Lawrence was asked to do with the original but in a more conventional way.

One big difference is that many guitarists are now less divided into Gibson or Fender camps, and back then, concepts like running pickups in parallel or in series was hard to conceptualize. The idea that a Gibson can also sound like a Fender isn't so heretical these days. Go into a Guitar Center on a Friday night, and you'll see that many guitarists can achieve the feat of making any guitar sound the same.

The new Gibson plays as well as the original, which was one of the few things most agreed on back then, that it was a great player. The coil splitting is the modern conventional way to achieve a single coil sound like the Fender, but it does sound different than the original Bill Lawrence setup, and with the wrong amp or setting, can sound a bit dull and thin. Nonetheless, it's the single coil sound that most people who play guitars with humbuckers will be familiar with.

Both have 24 fret necks, which will strike some as feeling similar to a Telecaster, which I find to my liking. The maple fretboard used here was present on some of the originals, which generally produces a love it or leave it reaction with the guitarist. My original has an ebony fretboard, which doesn't influence the sound all that much (I prefer my Fenders with maple necks anyway) so this Gibson sounded just fine to me 

Its clean tone is very good, the maple body creates a sparkling sustain, that's bright, but easily adjustable. One thing that was surprising in the original (and you'll find in this one) is that it can also sound very much like a Rickenbacker or Gretsch.

Its full powered rock sound veers more towards head banging or Rage Against The Machine than Black Sabbath, but even that can be adjusted. With the variety of amps and pedals these days, the guitar is just one part of a system now. If it fits your sound and setup, this is as good a guitar as any.

This review will be more relevant to those who might buy one used, as this version was a limited edition, and discontinued. It's new price was in the same range as a new Les Paul Studio or used Standard, so it's definitely a try before you  buy type guitar. Also, if you want a Fender sound, it's simply better to just get a Fender.

The reason I liked the original, and I think this one is close, is that while it did do a great job of getting a single coil sound, it was a bit different than a Fender. It's twang is harder, and darker, and its blues sound more like early 50s Chicago than Eric Johnson or Joe Bonnamassa.

If you want a classic Gibson sound, try a Les Paul or SG first. If you want a Fender sound, get a tele or Strat.

But...if you want to sound different than the other guys, this one is more than worth a look. Bill Lawrence created a concept that has seemingly survived modern industry compromise, and could separate you from the pack.

- Al Handa 

  2013

Note: This review first appeared on the ePinions.com site in 2013. This and other reviews were short takes that accompanied the link to a business that sold the guitar. As a rule, the guitar had to be at least examined and played by the reviewer (and ideally owned). In my case, a severe case of GAS made it possible to have at least owned the reviewed instrument for a short while. I'm reprinting these as having another source on a guitar never hurts, even if the reviews aren't definitive. Other than minor corrections, these short takes are unchanged from the original text. I figure that it might be helpful to keep the older perspective.

 

The Quitturz by Al Handa





AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



Here's info on some of my Vella books:




The Quitturz (title not changed on ad yet)


https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B09PC3L6PC



I, Ivy


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0B3RCBT4D



The Forbidden Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyde


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJ2TW4P1



The Boogie Underground Think Tank: How To Survive The End Of Civilization


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BG6LNXTG



The Adventures Of Queen Khleopahtra: Ruler Of Egypt, Time Traveler, and Literary Detective


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJC122G7


Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Please add any cuts you like to your playlists!

Thursday, March 28, 2024

Review: 2006 Epiphone Casino

Review: 2006 Epiphone Casino

Note: In 2024, the Casino is probably one of the most well documented guitars of all time. I’ll resist trying to duplicate that wealth of info and just stick with my 2006 remarks.

The Epiphone Casino, a double cutaway hollow-body guitar with P90 pickups, is one of the guitars most associated with the Beatles. John Lennon in particular, who used one pretty much all his life. George Harrison is also linked with it but made most of his early sounds on a Gretsch.

To be honest, it wasn't until the 70's that I realized that they used Casinos. Until then, it was a guitar I associated with Blues Legend John Lee Hooker, who used one in his early days. Also, I owned an ES-330 (double cutaway hollow body) back then, and just assumed the Epiphone was a low-cost copy.

Which it sort of was, but to Gibson's probable amazement, the Casino took off while the ES-330 faded away and was eventually replaced by the ES-335. The Casino was Epiphone's answer to the more expensive Gibson and was equipped with P-90's instead of humbuckers. That made it a better rock and roll guitar, which resonated more with the younger guitar buyers. 

It was a fine blues instrument. Listen to John Lee Hooker's Vee-Jay recordings like “Boom Boom”:and you'll see it has a wide range in that genre. Especially with a lot of reverb. This guitar was made for reverb. 

However, the modern-day version isn't like the original mid-60's original. A friend of mine has one from that era, and there's no comparison in terms of sound and versatility. This guitar is geared more towards those who want a “vintage rock sound,” which is a vague term and not always what you expect it to be.

Also, the Beatles often filtered their guitar tones through effects and did subtle layering, and the Casino by itself can't duplicate that. Also, George Harrison did a lot of his early leads with a Gretsch, which is a different animal. You'll find your ability to duplicate a Beatle guitar sound will depend on the song and era it was created in. 

What you do get are the sounds Lennon created as the rhythm guitarist on the early records, that chunky distortion pouring out of an underpowered Vox amp. Put that through a better amp, and your sounds probably won’t sound the same (though matching a particular sound is what the knobs are there for).

The story of the Beatles guitar sound isn't just about one guitar; it's also about the extra creativity required due to only having a four-track capability at Abbey Road (during a time when others had 8 track, etc), and a lot of creative geniuses working together.

For example, the mono version of the guitar classic, “Paperback Writer” sounded more powerful with studio distortion added and the mix. It wasn't just Lennon’s Casino turned up louder, as there were two guitars playing on that track 

Personally, I like the Casino. I never did get one due to its limitations, but no guitar that has P-90's is a total waste. Handled right, the guitar is quite capable of delivering smokey blues licks in the Hooker mold or twangy early English style rock. Hit the half chords and you can get the early Who sound just fine if a Rickenbacker is out of your price range.

Ergonomically, it's a fun guitar to play. It's quite light, fits on the leg just right, and it has very nice neck. The Casino has a cool look that just invites you to play, and for its type of music, there's nothing better in its price range. Plus, the Beatles played one, mojo counts for a lot.

There is three things you can do with a Casino. One, you can play a lot of early blues and rock sounds with it, but it won't necessarily make you sound like a Beatle. So toss away that idea, and you'll find that an easy to play guitar with two P-90's can take you to a lot of fun places. 

Two, you can replace the pickups with humbuckers and for thousands of thousands of dollars less get a guitar that will sound close to an ES-330 (a very nice jazz guitar). That might require a lot more work than just screwing in a new set of pickups, though.

Three, you can try to sound like the Beatle records, and discover that their genius was with how they created sound in the studio as they evolved, not in their guitar playing. You'll find yourself stuck in their early period, which sounds fine, but a little dated.

However, getting two out of three isn't bad at all.

- Al Handa

  2006

Note: This review first appeared on the ePinions.com site in 2013. This and other reviews were short takes that accompanied the link to a business that sold the guitar. As a rule, the guitar had to be at least examined and played by the reviewer (and ideally owned). In my case, a severe case of GAS made it possible to have at least owned the reviewed instrument for a short while. I'm reprinting these as having another source on a guitar never hurts, even if the reviews aren't definitive. Other than minor corrections, these short takes are unchanged from the original text. I figure that it might be helpful to keep the older perspective.


The Quitturz by Al Handa





AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



Here's info on some of my Vella books:




The Quitturz (title not changed on ad yet)


https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B09PC3L6PC



I, Ivy


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0B3RCBT4D



The Forbidden Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyde


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJ2TW4P1



The Boogie Underground Think Tank: How To Survive The End Of Civilization


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BG6LNXTG



The Adventures Of Queen Khleopahtra: Ruler Of Egypt, Time Traveler, and Literary Detective


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJC122G7


Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Please add any cuts you like to your playlists!

Review: Ibanez Artcore AFS75T

The Ibanez Artcore AFS75T: Still Standing Two Years Later On

 The Ibanez Artcore line caused quite a stir a couple of years back. Most of the guitars wouldn't have caused a lot of comment as higher priced models, but the fact that the lower line started at 325.00 was a revelation in world where affordable Archtops not named used Harmony Rockets were scarce. Archtops had been considered a niche item, but it was obvious that there was a lot of pent up demand in this price range.

Most of the media attention was focused on the large body 75 line, and the fact that it was a lot of guitar for the price. Whether or not it was enough to make it a really good archtop was more or less lost in the hype. The hype included bragging that other companies have asked Ibanez to make them Archtop guitars for rebranding (which they’ve always done, actually, that was never any secret in the guitar world).

There was no question that the lower line was a good deal, particularly if you played rockabilly or blues. The main audience for the guitar were rockers who leaped at the chance to own an archtop that looked good and was fairly priced.

Lost in the excitement was that the upper line Ibanez guitars were high quality and offered real competition to the dominant Epiphone line. It's now 2007, and the Artcores are now just another option and what was good and bad about those archtops is pretty clear. The original inexpensive line is still considered a nice guitar if you don't overpay for it. Its average used price in this area is around 250.00, if you include a hardshell case, and as low as 175.00 if you don't.

Also, no one who plays any amount of jazz takes it seriously as a jazzbox. In fact, it's rockabilly side is promoted more. The AFS75T has also dropped in value, going from a street price of over 700.00 to around 400.00. As such, it's not a bad deal, and a used one at an even lower price would be even better.

The shallow body AFS75 was one of the more popular models back in 2005, but was a bit pricey and was admired more than purchased. Given what it was, it should have been more popular. It was a configuration that could have competed well with the Epiphone Casino, or could have been promoted as an updated Gibson ES-125 thinline. Thinline archtops like the ES-125 (note: there is a full body version also) have always been popular on the used/vintage market and it's always been a wonder to me why Gibson or Epiphone hasn't re-released it.

The Ibanez, with its two ACH humbuckers isn't like the ES-125, which had a single P-90 and no cutaway, but it's a similar guitar. It's very playable, feels comfortable and easy to play.

However, Ibanez chose to go with a multi-dimensional type that could play different styles, and thus it has an all maple body and neck. With that kind of wood, even medium output humbuckers can lose their jazz character and become edgier (since Ibanez didn't choose to use their very fine jazzier humbuckers on this one). It's a bit bright for a lot of jazz applications. However, that’s probably a pickup issue as more than a few expensive jazz boxes use laminated maple to reduce feed back.

As a result, most comparisons are with the ES-335, a semi-solid Gibson type, and only beginners or intermediates are going to think the two are comparable. I've played both (and owned an ES-330), and the Artcore sounds pretty good, but isn't anywhere close to a Gibson.

This guitar in stock configuration would make a nice modern jazz guitar in the Methany mold, or be a good rocking blues instrument. Like all Ibanez's, it is well made, and worth upgrading. The key is to make sure you put in pickups like a Seymour Duncan Seth Lover or 59 model, Kent Armstrong, or Gibson alnico II magnet Burstbucker.

The tremelo bar, is of course, useless for jazz (IMHO). It's main appeal is for blues and rockabilly, which this guitar is well suited for. My lack of excitement for tremelo bars has been well shown in previous reviews, so I won't beat it to death. However, given the cost of a good one, I'd have recommended losing the tremelo bar, and putting in better pickups or a jazz-style tailpiece.

This would be an Artcore I'd recommend, even for a jazz player. It's basic concept of a thinline hollowbody is a good one. Hohner proved with its HS-40 that an all maple guitar can be an excellent medium priced jazzbox (of course, it has Kent Armstrong Vintage Humbuckers, a fine jazz pickup).

This Artcore is at a more realistic price now, as it was never better than an Epiphone Joe Pass. It is very upgradable, and when played stock, you can hear the potential that warmer pickups would bring to this guitar. Also, the blue finish is cool, and looks even better than in the pictures.

One interesting development in the Ibanez jazz line; some of the new models look a whole lot like Joe Pass's, with wood tailpieces (nice idea) and natural grain (like the most popular of the Pass line). Also, another model that's stayed around has a sharp cutaway like the Gibson ES-137. 

Perhaps since 2005 the Artcore line has had the cockiness knocked out of it, and with it a realization that the Epiphones dominate the medium price Archtop market for a reason. They know the market, and the market wants more than flash and will pay more for quality and tradition. But in the case of this Artcore, with some upgrades and the right attitude, both you and guitar will soon be on the true path of medium level jazz guitar ownership free of Epiphone envy.

- Al Handa
  2006

Note: This review first appeared on the ePinions.com site in 2013. This and other reviews were short takes that accompanied the link to a business that sold the guitar. As a rule, the guitar had to be at least examined and played by the reviewer (and ideally owned). In my case, a severe case of GAS made it possible to have at least owned the reviewed instrument for a short while. I'm reprinting these as having another source on a guitar never hurts, even if the reviews aren't definitive. Other than minor corrections, these short takes are unchanged from the original text. I figure that it might be helpful to keep the older perspective.

The Quitturz by Al Handa





AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



AVAILABLE ON KINDLE UNLIMTED



Here's info on some of my Vella books:




The Quitturz (title not changed on ad yet)


https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B09PC3L6PC



I, Ivy


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0B3RCBT4D



The Forbidden Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyde


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJ2TW4P1



The Boogie Underground Think Tank: How To Survive The End Of Civilization


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BG6LNXTG



The Adventures Of Queen Khleopahtra: Ruler Of Egypt, Time Traveler, and Literary Detective


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BJC122G7


Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Please add any cuts you like to your playlists!