 |
Retrospective Review: The 1992 Gibson Les Paul Studio Lite M-III - The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly Of Offsets
The Gibson Les Paul Studio Lite M-III was basically a standard Studio with some important exceptions; it had a two split coil humbuckers and NSX single coil pickup in the middle position for a Strat configuration option, five way switch and a weight-relieved mahogany-chromite body with a maple top.
I bought one used in 2012 and it was a very naturally relic'd transparent blue 1992 model. To this day, I think it was one of the most beat up guitars I’ve ever owned. It was in production for several years, from what I could see, and the reason I say that is because I never saw any others around, although if you Google it there's stores and people selling them for around 1500-2000 dollars.
That would be a little high for a studio but it did feature a middle pickup that combined with coil split (position 2 on toggle) to create a strat style configuration with a five way switch and the 5th position was a kill switch in humbucker mode. Also, the body was chambered for weight relief, which I should add was the main attraction for me. The M-III was the model I kept the longest because a light Les Paul is ergonomically one of the most comfortable guitars you'll ever play.
The use of super hot ceramic pickups was ultimately the reason it was traded off. The 400T/496R humbucker set was actually a good choice for a coil split and did a decent job of emulating a super strat sound but I think two things worked against it: One, it was a lot cheaper to just buy it a used or new import super strat and the audience for that type of guitar weren't hung up about only buying American. Two, the super hot ceramic pickups solved the usual problem of a less than impressive single coil sound from a split humbucker.
In the end, I was more the type of guitarist who liked the idea of a traditional body LP Studio with a single coil strat option but wasn't interested in a shredder. I kept it for quite a while, taking it to more rehearsals and practices then any other guitar I had at the time but gradually found myself using my usual teles for any work in the studio.
Another reason that this type of Les Paul didn't take over the world is for the same reason the Nashville Tele never did either, is that a single coil in the middle position isn't the ideal configuration. The middle pickup isn't the most popular position on a strat and it was always considered a versatile compromise in a Nashville Tele. Plus, once you start using a coil split in the bridge position, you might as well just go for a similarly wired HH Les Paul Studio.
That all being said, I did really like the guitar and probably would have simply changed out the humbuckers to alnicos and used a cool rail in the middle, which is a single coil that worked well for me in the past (in an old Swiss army knife modded strat) except that modding that type of complex wiring was beyond my abilities at the time. As far as a chambered Les Paul, I think that should be an option for every model because once you've played one that light, it's really hard to go back to a heavy Les Paul.
In my long life as a GAS addict, the Gibson Les Paul Special Lite M-III is definitely on the list of guitars I wished I'd have kept. However, the reason I never went back and got another one is that, in my case, a decent set of telecasters and an offset jazzmaster does the job just fine.
That's the problem with a lot of offsets, the specs rarely live up to the reality. In the case of the M-III, a company like Ibanez or Jackson probably would have come up with a design that would have appealed more to the audience that would consider that type of Les Paul (but never would because a strat style design turned out to be more to the liking of the younger shredders at the time).
Which is another point to consider, the reason Eddie Van Halen would have been willing to modify a Strat into what became his trademark guitar was due to the fact that a Fender owner would do that. On the other hand, a Gibson owner would probably not have even entertained the thought of completely redoing their Les Paul into a Frankenstein guitar.
The M-III was a very worthy guitar that could be said to have been designed by a company that wanted to create a Les Paul for a younger crowd but didn't understand why those guitarists liked their Jacksons, Ibanezes and Frankenstrats. However, Gibson had previously created more than a few guitars that broke the mold and none ever took. So, it may have been not a bad idea to simply create an offset configuration and maybe if someone like Eddie Van Halen or Steve Vai had embraced the guitar, things would have been different.
The history of guitar isn't a steady evolution of technology evolution and design but more often than not, nostalgia, fashion and a little luck.
Al Handa
Aug 9, 2026
Model Les Paul Studio Lite M-III
Finish Trans Blue
Year 1992
Made United States
Single Cutaway Solid Body
Bridge/Tailpiece Stop-Bar
Fretboard Material Ebony
Model Gibson Les Paul Studio Lite
Neck Construction Set-Neck
Number of Frets 22
Number of Strings 6-String
Pickup Configuration HSH
400T/496R humbuckers
NSX Single Coil pickup
Unbound Ebony fretboard
Five way switch
Two position toggle
weight-relieved Mahogany/Chromyte body with Maple Top
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
